
The Boulevard Proposal has been approved for Masonic Ave. in San Francisco!
SF’s first (and maybe west coast’s? are there any in...
I have an idea!
The economic strength of US cities.
Photo of the Day: Stormy Sunset at Moulton Barn
Photo By: Brian Kerls (Denver, CO); Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming
I’ve been spoiled this month at parties with friends who are particularly good brewers. I’ve really enjoyed Dan’s rye...
> Some people, who don’t like the idea of toll roads in general, will take these...
Below is a picture of a bus stop on USM’s campus. Can you see it? To the uninitiated it is tough to find. It is indicated by the yellow sign. For a campus that has signed onto an initiative to become carbon neutral by 2040, this is making little headway to reducing auto dependency.

How important is reducing auto dependency to achieving these goals? USM’s faculty and staff (estimated at ~2000 people) create 12% of the carbon emissions on campus by their commutes. The report doesn’t include students in its carbon assessment, but considering that there are 8,000 students, it is easy to see that emissions from students could increase that 12% figure substantially considering commute patterns and location choices.
Back to the bus stop and how this all ties in. If you want to become a climate neutral campus, you have to make some steps towards improving transit. Portland, ME has bad weather, so what about a shelter? There are steps being taken to use GPS transponders to track buses and through the QR Codes on signs, allow smart devices to pinpoint exact times buses are to arrive. That is a great step in the right direction at getting people the information they need to use transit more effectively. However, once you are at the stop, you need a dignified place to wait. Some place out of inclement weather.
I am sure there are questions about who would pay for such a shelter, but considering the asphalt parking lot and its high costs, a decent, artfully designed shelter would be pocket change to the University that wants to be carbon neutral by 2040?
Would people walk more if they knew how far (long) it was? In Raleigh, NC tactical urbanists put up (gasp) signs indicating how far it was in minutes to popular destinations around town. Town got grumpy, town took down signs, town got ridiculed, town put signs back up.
A lot of Maine towns are small towns, and walking presents a real option for getting around much of the year. Heck, if you are a tough Mainer, you can do it all year round. What if we started by walking or cycling 1 trip a week, that was usually taken by car? A little exercise, some fresh air, less tailpipe emissions…couldn’t be so bad? Would some signs help? Not sure, but they couldn’t hurt.