Mainely Planning

Why plan for an uncertain future? Our world is changing in ways that we can hardly comprehend. The planning we have been engaged in over the last 100 years, is geared to a world with abundant energy, a stable climate, and a dwindling natural resource endowment that is reliant on cheap energy for extraction. That world is quickly becoming a thing of the past.

Oil price spikes due to supply/demand and geopolitical concerns, water shortages (Google Lake Mead, Central Valley, CA or the Ogallala Aquifer for details), and soil depletion are just a few of the problems we face. As we move forward, the notion that we can continue with business as usual (BAU) is not going to sustain us.

Thinking creatively and making difficult decisions will test our abilities, push our cultural boundaries and hopefully shape a world where these uncomfortable realities can be dealt with in an equitable and meaningful manner. I write about things I see, think, and work on as I transition from being a planning student into the world of planning. I am neither a technological optimist, thinking we can invent our way out of all our problems, nor a doomer, believing in returning to a world much like pre-industrial times. I believe that our creativity combined with the lessons from the past will be instrumental tools for laying the foundation for the path forward. Some of my ideas may seem radical, others are just based on common sense and keen observations.


Links of Note


Mainely Rural
The Old Pine Tree
Strong Towns
Project For Public Spaces
Streets Blog
Cap'n Transit Rides Again
Human Transit
Pedestrian Observations
Urbanophile
The Broken Sidewalk
Maine Architecture
The Vigorous North
Depot Redux
Reason and Rail
Car Free Maine
Walk Around Portland




Transportation for America State Fact Sheets


A Reason to Plan



Creative Commons License
Mainely Planning is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
I like:
Following:
Posts tagged "automobiles"

Couple questions:

- Is MTV relevant any more? Last I checked they sucked. Confession: I haven’t had a TV in 18+ years so how would I know?

- Fuel prices are part of the equation, but not the entire story. Is the younger generation environmentally conscious or merely frugal?

A statement disguised as a question:

- When will GM, Ford and Chrysler start building good transit vehicles, and not involve themselves in running (destroying) transportation services? Wait, they already did that.

A Statement:

- Rural areas will continue to feel a long slow death until they can build walkable villages and town centers that are transit connected to larger metros. It isn’t that we don’t like these places. It isn’t that we don’t want to live in small towns (pick anywhere in Maine outside Bangor, Portland, L/A). We might, but we need transportation options that are frequent enough to feel like we have freedom.

Source of confusion: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/business/media/to-draw-reluctant-young-buyers-gm-turns-to-mtv.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

I haven’t been privy to such an eloquent and well placed argument about cycling, transportation and how we perceive our environment (urban or rural) in some time. Kasey makes a compelling argument that once on a bike, we can see the world through at a human pace. We notice things that we never would when we wiz past in our motor cars.

In Portland, Maine, I tend towards being a pedestrian as opposed to cycling. This has a similar effect, where you (the pedestrian or cyclist) can observe things at a pace and scale that allow for meaningful observation of the world around you. As I walk through Deering Park I notice the trash, the speeds at which automobiles race through the park to beat the light, and the traffic infractions and poorly designed infrastructure that creates dangerous situations for cyclists, walkers and drivers alike.

To be a planner, city manager, public works official, or even a citizen, perhaps we can learn more about the places we call home by walking or cycling past, instead of whizzing by. Autos insulate us from the ills of society, separates us from the commons, and create the conditions ripe for community decline. By getting out and experiencing the world at a slow pace, we will understand what disinvestment brings and the places it creates that are only worth whizzing by.

Get out and experience the places you live at a human pace. You might find something you love, something that is worth fixing, and a new extension of the place you call home.

Below is Kasey’s thoughtful essay on cycling that prompted me to write about this.

The Real Reason Why Bicycles are the Key to Better Cities

secretrepublic:

We all know the talking points. The benefits of bicycles have been tirelessly elaborated upon; bicycles improve health, ease congestion, save money, use less space, and provide efficient transportation with zero fuel consumption and zero carbon emissions. All of this is great, and the culmination of a population on two wheels can have a drastic impact on the overall wellbeing of a city.

However, none of these come close to the most meaningful aspect of cycling, a factor that cannot be quantified but has endless value to those fighting to improve their communities.

The most vital element for the future of our cities is that the bicycle is an instrument of experiential understanding.

On a bicycle, citizens experience their city with deep intimacy, often for the first time. For a regular motorist to take that two or three mile trip by bicycle instead is to decimate an enormous wall between them and their communities.

In their cars, the world is reduced to mere equation. “What is the fastest route from A to B?” one will ask as they start their engine. This invariably results in a cascade of freeway concrete flying by at incomprehensible speeds. Their environment, the neighborhoods that compose their communities, the beauty of architecture, the immense societal problems in distressed areas, the faces of neighbors… all of this becomes a conceptually abstract blur from the driver’s seat.

Yes, the bicycle is a marvelously efficient machine of transportation, but in the city it is so much more. The bicycle is new vision for the blind man. It is a thrilling tool of communication, an experiential device for the beauty and the ills of the urban context. One cannot turn a blind eye on a bicycle - they must acknowledge their community, all of it.

Here lies the secret weapon of the urban renaissance.

You see, those of us fighting for our cities, we struggle because too few see the problems, and fewer understand the solutions. They are quite literally racing past the issue, too busy to see, too fast to comprehend.

I cannot approach the average citizen and explain the innate intricacies of land use and transportation relationships, how density is vital to urban sustainability, how our sprawled real estate developments are built on economic quicksand, how our freeways shredded the urban fabric like a rusty dagger, how deeply our lives would be enriched by a collective commitment to urbanism.

Not only will their eyes glaze over, but they may very well become outraged. No one wants to be told that they must radically alter their lifestyle, no matter how well you sell it.

The bicycle doesn’t need to be sold. It’s economical, it’s fun, it’s sexy, and just about everyone already has one hiding somewhere in their garage.

Invite a motorist for a bike ride through your city and you’ll be cycling with an urbanist by the end of the day. Even the most eloquent of lectures about livable cities and sustainable design can’t compete with the experience from atop a bicycle saddle.

“These cars are going way too fast,” they may mutter beneath their breath.

“How are we supposed to get across the highway?”

“Wow, look at that cathedral! I didn’t know that was there.”

“I didn’t realize there were so many vacant lots in this part of town.”

“Hey, let’s stop at this cafe for a drink.”

Suddenly livability isn’t an abstract concept, it’s an experience. Human scale, connectivity, land use efficiency, urban fabric, complete streets… all the codewords, catchphrases, and academic jargon can be tossed out the window because now they are one synthesized moment of appreciation. Bicycles matter because they are a catalyst of understanding - become hooked on the thrill of cycling, and everything else follows. Now that new freeway isn’t a convenience but an impediment. Mixed-use development isn’t a threat to privacy but an opportunity for community. And maybe, just maybe, car-free living will eventually be seen not as restrictive, but as a door to newfound freedom.

The real reason why bicycles are the key to better cities?

Some might call it enlightenment.

-Kasey Klimes

Your car costs about $8.5k per year to buy, fill, fix and park according to the AAA. Living in a place with access to transit, without a car will save you most of that.

Source: http://edsteinink.com/2012/02/23/4-gas/

Do interstates through cities cheapen our cities? I-295 in Portland could/should be a candidate for a tear-down. Good question to ask is how would traffic be impacted by turning this into a boulevard? Since I-295 isn’t tolled, is it too convenient? Lots of questions that I am sure will be frowned upon by planners, engineers, and citizens alike. Perhaps when we realize how much it will cost to rebuild and what the lost opportunity cost is, will we maybe think a bit more about radically changing our landscape for the better. The Original Green lays out why highways in cities are a tax revenue looser for cities and the quality of life for those who live there.